Claim type · Clinical Negligence

A&E Negligence claims.

Serious conditions missed in the emergency department — patients sent home with undiagnosed heart attacks, strokes, sepsis, fractures and more.

Tell us what happened and we'll show you published judgments like yours, outline what you could be entitled to, and, if you choose, put you in touch with specialist solicitors Tomlin & Partners.

Typical range

£10,000 – £1,000,000

Limitation period

3 years

G
ClaimGavel Assistant
● Online · A&E Negligence · free & confidential
FREE
TELL US WHAT HAPPENED — TYPE HERE
Our early readAI estimate — a solicitor confirms it
A&E Negligence
Typical range
£10K – £1M
Time limit
3 years

Describe what happened (a sentence or two) to begin.

Free · confidential · not legal adviceEngland
Enquiries for this claim typeIndependent firm · their stated offer

Handled by Tomlin & Partners (SRA 8001484) — “Free, no-obligation consultation with our specialist medical negligence team.”

§ PUBLISHED JUDGMENTS

Real a&e negligence cases, decided by the courts.

Every case below is a published judgment of the courts of England and Wales, linked to its source. Summaries are ours; amounts appear only where the judgment states them. We include claims that failed, because they show what has to be proved.

Claimant succeeded

JBX v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust

[2026] EWHC 2294 (KB)·2026·Damages assessed at trial

An eight-year-old brought to Frimley Park Hospital in January 2018 with severe breathing difficulty was discharged the same afternoon instead of being admitted and given steroids; the next day he had a cardiac arrest and catastrophic brain injury. The Trust admitted negligence and causation and this judgment decides disputed heads of damages.

Sending a child home from A&E with signs of life-threatening asthma, rather than admitting and treating, was admitted to be negligent. Once liability is admitted the dispute moves to how care and lost earnings should be valued.

Claimant succeeded£550,000

Alexander v HCA International Limited & Anor

[2026] EWHC 1284 (KB)·2026·Liability decided at trial

A patient developed life-threatening pancreatitis after a gallstone-removal ERCP. The judge found the consultant never prescribed or instructed the standard preventive diclofenac suppository, so it was not given, and entered judgment for £550,000 against him.

Failing to give a recognised prophylactic drug before a procedure can be negligent even in private care. The prescribing doctor, not the hospital, carried the liability here.

Mixed outcome

MAN v St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

[2024] EWHC 1304 (KB)·2024·Liability decided at trial

A woman went to A&E with extreme lower-leg pain and was sent home by a nurse practitioner instead of being seen by a senior doctor or referred to surgeons; she developed a necrotising soft tissue infection and lost her leg. The Trust admitted negligence but tried to rely on the nurse's evidence disputing how much pain she reported; the Master ruled that evidence inadmissible because the defence had never properly pleaded that dispute.

An NHS trust cannot admit negligence and then quietly contest the facts at trial without pleading them. Severe, out-of-proportion pain in a limb is a recognised warning sign of necrotising infection that calls for senior review.

Claim failed

O'Brien v Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust

[2022] EWHC 2735 (KB)·2022·Liability decided at trial

A man with end-stage kidney failure was given a single 400mg gentamicin dose for a chest infection and suffered permanent balance and hearing damage. His sister's claim failed because the judge accepted that a high dose was a reasonable choice for a worsening infection with sepsis risk, despite his renal impairment.

A drug dose that causes known side-effects is not automatically negligent if it was a reasonable clinical judgement in the circumstances. Departing from a hospital guideline is not itself proof of negligence.

Claimant succeeded

Phoebe Charmaine Pickering v Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

[2022] EWHC 1171 (QB)·2022·Liability decided at trial

Ms Pickering, who had atrial fibrillation, attended A&E with a cold, white leg; doctors diagnosed a resolved ischaemic event and sent her home on aspirin without heparin or a warning about her stroke risk. She had a major stroke 67 hours later, and the court found that anticoagulation would have prevented it.

A transient blockage in a limb can signal a clot from the heart, and discharging such a patient without anticoagulation or advice was admitted to be negligent. The case turned on causation, with the court accepting expert evidence that heparin would have stopped the clot progressing.

Claim failed

Watson v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

[2022] EWHC 148 (QB)·2022·Liability decided at trial

A 29-year-old with sudden facial droop, speech problems and arm weakness was told by a junior A&E doctor she had migraine and was not referred to the TIA clinic, which the Trust admitted was a breach. Ritchie J found her March symptoms were in fact hemiplegic migraine, not mini-strokes, so the missed referral did not cause her later stroke.

Admitted breach of duty is not enough; the claimant must prove the correct pathway would have prevented the injury. Detailed findings about the exact sequence of symptoms decided this case.

Browse the case library →

Contains information licensed under the Open Justice - Licence v2.0. Judgments from Find Case Law, The National Archives. Summaries are ours; amounts only where printed in the judgment.

About A&E Negligence Claims

Accident & Emergency departments are pressured environments, but patients are entitled to a reasonable standard of assessment before being sent home. A&E negligence claims arise when a serious, treatable condition is missed and the patient is discharged — often with reassurance — only for the condition to progress to serious harm.

The conditions most often missed in A&E are well known: heart attacks (chest pain put down to indigestion or anxiety), strokes and bleeds on the brain, sepsis and meningitis, appendicitis, fractures missed on X-ray or never X-rayed at all, significant head injuries discharged without scanning, DVT and pulmonary embolism, and ruptured or leaking abdominal aortic aneurysms. In each case there are recognised assessment pathways — ECGs and troponin tests for chest pain, CT scans for head injury under NICE guidance, sepsis screening, imaging review — that should catch the condition.

A claim must show that the assessment fell below the standard of a reasonably competent emergency clinician — for example, an X-ray misread, red-flag symptoms not investigated, or abnormal observations not acted on — and that proper care would probably have avoided the harm. Records of triage notes, observations and imaging are central evidence, and hospitals' own patient safety investigations (formerly "serious incident" investigations — since 2023 run under the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework) often support the claim.

Compensation depends on the missed condition and its consequences: from £10,000–£50,000 for a missed fracture with delayed recovery, to six and seven figures where a missed heart attack, stroke, sepsis or aneurysm causes permanent disability. Fatal cases are brought by the family under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976. The limitation period is generally 3 years from the harm or date of knowledge.

Typical Compensation Range

£10Kto£1M

Based on reported settlements and court awards. Individual case values vary significantly.

Limitation Period

3 years

May vary by jurisdiction. Don't wait — time limits apply.

NHS Negligence Data

See real NHS Resolution data related to a&e negligence claims.

· FREE ASSESSMENT · CONFIDENTIAL · 2 MINUTES ·

Think you might have a a&e negligence claim?

Our AI assistant will assess your claim in minutes, show you what you could be entitled to, and, if you choose, put you in touch with specialist medical negligence solicitors Tomlin & Partners. Free, confidential, no obligation.

Begin free assessment →