§ CASE LIBRARY

Real medical negligence cases,
every one linked to the judgment.

Published judgments of the courts of England and Wales, summarised in plain English: what went wrong, what the court decided, and the sum where the judgment states it. We include the claims that failed as well as the ones that succeeded, because they show what you have to prove.

Judgments

152

With the sum stated

33

Claimant succeeded

87

Claim failed

59

G
ClaimGavel Assistant
● Online · medical negligence · free & confidential
FREE
TELL US WHAT HAPPENED — TYPE HERE

Start typing — your likely claim, value and time limit appear here.

Describe what happened (a sentence or two) to begin.

Free · confidential · not legal adviceEngland

§ WAYS IN

Sums stated (33)£1M and above (13)Claims that failed (59)Fault admitted (42)Court approvals (10)Periodical payments (30)Delayed diagnosis (95)Brain injury (32)Consent claims (13)Leading cases (6)Infection and sepsis (31)Surgery claims (64)Claims for children (39)Fatal claims (22)
AllSum statedClaimant succeededClaim failed
Every claim typeClinical Negligence (10)Surgical Errors (12)Cerebral Palsy (13)Birth Injuries (1)Misdiagnosis & Delayed Diagnosis (7)Erb's Palsy (1)GP Negligence (16)Maternal Birth Injury (4)Stillbirth & Neonatal Death (2)Neonatal Injury (5)Sepsis Negligence (5)Cauda Equina Syndrome (7)DVT & Blood Clot (2)A&E Negligence (16)Cancer Misdiagnosis & Delayed Diagnosis (6)Orthopaedic Negligence (4)Vascular Negligence (6)Cardiac Negligence (6)Brain & Spinal Surgery Negligence (13)Urology & Catheter Injury (5)Anaesthetic Negligence (2)Fatal Medical Negligence (9)
Claim failed

Jacqueline Beatty v Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

[2023] EWHC 3163 (KB)·2023·Liability decided at trial

Ms Beatty, in hospital with severe cellulitis, developed ischaemic toes; a vascular surgeon diagnosed vasculitis rather than an embolism and did not order a CT angiogram, and she later needed a below-knee amputation. The judge found the surgeon's diagnosis was supported by a responsible body of medical opinion and dismissed the claim.

A diagnosis that turns out to be wrong is not automatically negligent; if a responsible body of specialists would have reached the same view on the information available, the claim fails under the Bolam test.

Claim failed

Middleton v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust

[2022] EWHC 2981 (KB)·2022·Liability decided at trial

Mr Middleton's acutely ischaemic leg was diagnosed at lunchtime but bypass surgery did not happen until after midnight, about 14 hours later. The judge found it was reasonable to obtain CT imaging first and that surgery by mid-afternoon was not mandatory, and that earlier surgery would not have prevented the nerve injury in any event.

Obtaining imaging before emergency vascular surgery can be reasonable practice, and a claim fails unless earlier treatment would probably have avoided the injury.

Claim failed

Lane v Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust & Anor

[2017] EWHC 1900 (QB)·2017·Liability decided at trial

After a heart attack and angioplasty, Mrs Lane developed a blocked artery in her right arm; it was diagnosed at 02:30 but she was not transferred to the vascular unit until the morning and thrombectomy was done that evening. The judge found the delays and surgery were not negligent and that, in any event, the arm was successfully reperfused so the later amputation was not caused by any delay.

Delay alone is not enough: a claimant must show both that the delay fell below a reasonable standard and that earlier treatment would have changed the outcome. Deferring surgery for an unstable cardiac patient can be a reasonable clinical judgment.

Contains information licensed under the Open Justice - Licence v2.0. Judgments from Find Case Law, The National Archives. Summaries are ours; amounts only where printed in the judgment.

§ HOW TO READ THESE

Most claims never reach a judgment. They settle privately, and settlement sums are confidential. Judgments surface when liability is disputed, when damages are fought over, or when a court must approve a settlement for a child or someone who lacks capacity. That is why approvals and damages trials are where the public figures come from.

Amounts are only what the judgment prints. Where a case shows a lump sum plus periodical payments, the yearly payments continue for life and can be worth far more than the lump sum. Where no figure is shown, the court decided fault but the money was settled or assessed elsewhere.

Plain-English guides built on these cases →

This guide is general information about the law in England and Wales, not legal advice about your case. ClaimGavel is run by Costart Projects Ltd on behalf of Tomlin & Partners, a specialist medical negligence firm regulated by the SRA. The free assessment on this page is an AI overview to show you roughly where you stand; a solicitor confirms the position in a free, no-obligation conversation.